RAS PhysicsПоверхность. Рентгеновские, синхротронные и нейтронные исследования Journal of Surface Investigation. X-Ray, Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques

  • ISSN (Print) 1028-0960
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5731

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Analysis of Changes in the Allotropic Structure of Samples of Tungsten and Carbon Subjected to Plasma Treatment

PII
S3034573125100113-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034573125100113
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 10
Pages
84-93
Abstract
A signal processing technique for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy has been developed, based on the interpretation of both the peak area and the energy loss region adjacent to the peaks of photoelectrons. The methodology is based on the method of partial intensities. The results of the calculation of partial coefficients obtained in the small-angle approximation are in good agreement with calculations performed using Monte Carlo simulation. It is noted that the calculation of partial coefficients, carried out in the smallangle approximation, allows for obtaining analytical expressions that significantly reduce computation time compared to the Monte Carlo simulation method, which is traditionally used for such calculations. This methodology has enabled the analysis of changes in the allotropic structure of materials subjected to helium plasma, simulating conditions at the plasma-wall interface in nuclear fusion devices. The changes in the allotrope type of MPG-8 grade graphite and tungsten under plasma exposure have been studied. It has been shown that the surface of the MPG-8 sample acquires a structure resembling pyrolytic graphite as a result of plasma exposure. It has been established that the dielectric permittivity of tungsten does not change when tungsten “fuzz” forms on the surface of the sample due to plasma action. There is a noted growth of tungsten carbide as a result of plasma exposure.
Keywords
рентгеновская фотоэлектронная спектроскопия метод парциальных интенсивностей аллотропные разновидности вольфрам углерод внутрикамерные материалы термоядерных установок
Date of publication
25.02.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
5

References

  1. 1. Briggs D., Grant J.T. Surface Analysis by Auger and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Chichester: IM Publ, 2003. 899 p.
  2. 2. Hoffman S. Auger and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy in Material Science. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2012. 528 p.
  3. 3. Tikhonov A.N., Arsenin V.A. Solutions of ill-posed problems. Washington: Halsted Press, 1977. 258 p.
  4. 4. Tougaard S. // J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A. 1996. V. 14. Iss. 3. P. 1415. https://www.doi.org/10.1116/1.579963
  5. 5. CasaXPS (2022) Casa Software Ltd. http://www.casaxps.com
  6. 6. Werner W.S.M. // Surf. Interface Anal. 1995. V. 23. Iss. 11. P. 737. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/sia.740231103
  7. 7. Будаев В.П., Федорович С.Д., Лукашевский М.В., Мартыненко Ю.В., Губкин М.К., Карпов А.В., Лазукин А.В., Шестаков Е.А. // ВАНТ. Сер. Термоядерный синтез. 2017. Т. 40. Вып. 3. С. 23. https://www.doi.org/10.21517/0202-3822-2017-40-3-23-36
  8. 8. Тилинин И.С. // ЖЭТФ. 1982. Т. 82. Вып. 4. С. 1291.
  9. 9. Tilinin I.S., Werner W.S.M. // Surf. Sci. 1993. V. 290. Iss. 1–2. P. 119. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028 (93)90594-A
  10. 10. Ландау Л.Д. // Собрание трудов. М.: Наука, 1969. 512 с.
  11. 11. Pauly N., Novák M., Tougaard S. // Surf. Interface Anal. 2013. V. 45. Iss. 4. P. 811. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/sia.5167
  12. 12. Garcia-Molina R., Abril I., Denton C.D., Heredia-Avalos S. // Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 2006. V. 249. Iss. 1–2. P. 6. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2006.03.011
  13. 13. Strehlow W.H., Cook E.L. // J. Phys. Chem. Ref. 1973. V. 2. Iss. 1. P. 163. https://www.doi.org/10.1063/1.3253115
  14. 14. Baldwin M.J., Doerner R.P. // J. Nucl. Mater. 2010. V. 404. Iss. 3. P. 165. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.06.034
  15. 15. Wright G.M., Brunner D., Baldwin M.J., Doerner R.P., Labombard B., Lipschultz B., Terry J.L., Whyte D.G. // Nucl. Fusion. 2012. V. 52. № 4. P. 042003. https://www.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/52/4/042003
  16. 16. Afanas’ev V.P., Gryazev A.S., Efremenko D.S., Kaplya P.S. // Vacuum. 2017. V. 136. P. 146. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2016.10.021
  17. 17. Salvat F., Jablonski A., Powell C.J. // Comput. Phys. Comm. 2005. V. 165. Iss. 2. P. 157. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2004.09.006
  18. 18. Tanuma S., Powell C.J., Penn D.R. // Surf. Interface Anal. 2005. V. 37. Iss. 1. P. 1. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/sia.1997
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library