RAS PhysicsПоверхность. Рентгеновские, синхротронные и нейтронные исследования Journal of Surface Investigation. X-Ray, Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques

  • ISSN (Print) 1028-0960
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5731

Formation of Nanoporous Germanium Layers by Irradiation with Indium Ions

PII
S3034573125090058-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034573125090058
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 9
Pages
37-45
Abstract
Currently, thin nanoporous Ge layers are applied in various technological devices, such as, for example, in the anode structures of lithium-ion batteries, IR-absorbing gas sensors, etc. A separate interesting application of such layers is their use as highly effective antireflection optical coatings for various photodetectors and solar cells. This study is devoted to the problem of creating an antireflection coating on a c-Ge surface using low-energy high-dose implantation of In ions in a vacuum, as opposed to the generally accepted chemical method, which leads to the accumulation of chemical reaction residues in the created nanoporous structures. The study results of the surface modification of polished monocrystal c-Ge substrate irradiated with In ions with an energy of 30 keV are presented at a current density of 5 μA/cm and a wide range of high doses of 1.0 × 10–7.2 × 10 ions/cm. Morphological analysis of surface topography was carried out using high-resolution scanning electron microscopy. The appearance and change in the morphology of porous layers with increasing ion dose were determined. At the lowest dose value of 1.8 × 10 ions/cm, a hole porous structure with nanometer round holes is formed. When the critical dose value of 1.9 × 10 ions/cm is exceeded, the formation of a spongy porous structure formed by intertwining nanowires is observed, geometric parameters of which do not further change with increasing dose. By measuring the optical reflection spectra of the implanted layers, it was shown that the formed material is characterized by a low reflectance in the spectral region of 220–1050 nm and can serve as an effective antireflection coating.
Keywords
ионная имплантация нанопористый германий ионы индия ионная доза и энергия плотность тока в ионном пучке морфология поверхности электронная сканирующая микроскопия оптическое антиотражающее покрытие оптическое отражение вольтамперные характеристики
Date of publication
12.02.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
3

References

  1. 1. Raut H.K., Ganesh V.A., Nair A.S., Ramakrishna S. // Energy Environ. Sci. 2011. V. 4. P. 3779. http://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01297e
  2. 2. Cai J., Qi L. // Mater. Horiz. 2015. V. 2. P. 37. http://doi.org/10.1039/c4mh00140k
  3. 3. Khan S.B., Wu H., Pan C., Zhang Z. // Research Rev. J. Mater. Sci. 2017. V. 5. P. 36. http://doi.org/10.4172/2321-6212.1000192
  4. 4. Shanmugam N., Pugazhendhi R., Elavarasan R.M. et al. // Energies. 2020. V.13. P. 2631. http://doi.org/10.3390/en13102631
  5. 5. Han Lu., Zhao H. // Opt. Express. 2014. V. 22. № 26. P. 31908. http://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.031907
  6. 6. Liu S., Tso C.Y., Lee H.H. et al. // Sci. Reports. 2020. V. 10. P. 11376. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68411-6
  7. 7. Yelisseyev A.P., Isaenko L.I., Lobanov S.I. et al. // Opt. Mater. Express. V. 12. № 4. P. 1593. http://doi.org/10.1364/OME.455050
  8. 8. Chang C.-C., Huang C.-H. // Electronics. 2022. V. 11. P. 2068. http://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11132068
  9. 9. Kim S., Jeong G.S., Park N.Y., Choi J.-Y. // Micromachines. 2021. V. 12. P. 119. http://doi.org/10.3390/mi2020119
  10. 10. Schicho S., Jaouad A., Sellmer C. et al. // Meter. Lett. 2013. V. 94. P. 86. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2012.12.014
  11. 11. Steglich M., Kasebier T., Kley E.-B., Tunnermann A. // Appl. Phys. A. 2016. V. 122. P. 836. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-0318-y
  12. 12. Chueh Y.-L., Fan Z., Takei K. et al. // Nano Lett. V. 10. P. 520. http://doi.org/10.1021/nl903366z
  13. 13. Nayak B., Gupta M.C., Kolasinski K.W. // Nanotechnology. 2007. V. 18. P. 195302. http://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/19/195302
  14. 14. Kaufmann R., Isella G., Sanchez-Amores A. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2011. V. 110. P. 023107. http://doi.org/10.1063/1.3608245
  15. 15. Tang L., Kocabas S.E., Latif S. et al. // Nat. Photonics. 2008. V. 2. P. 226. http://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2008.30
  16. 16. Posthuma N.E., van der Heide J., Flamand G., Poortmans J. // IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 2007. V. 54. P. 1210. http://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2007.894610
  17. 17. Gilbert L.R., Messier R., Roy R. // Thin solid films. 1978. V. 54. P. 149.
  18. 18. Kadakia N., Naczas S., Bakhru H., Huang M. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010. V. 97. P. 191912.
  19. 19. Rogov A.M., Nuzhdin V.I., Valeev V.F., Stepanov A.L. // Composites Commun. 2020. V. 19. P. 6. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2020.01.002
  20. 20. Степанов А.Л., Нуждин В.И., Рогов А.М., Воробьев В.В. Формирование слоев пористого кремния и германия с металлическими наночастиами. Казань: ФИЦПРЕСС, 2019. 198 c.
  21. 21. Auret F.D., van Rensburg P.J.J., Hayes M. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006. V. 89. P. 152123.
  22. 22. Stepanov A.L., Zhikharev V.A., Hole D.E., Townsend P.D. // Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B. V. 166. P. 26 (2000).
  23. 23. Nastasi M., Mayer J.W., Hirvonen J.K. Ion-solid interactions. Fundamentals and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press., 1996. 540 p.
  24. 24. Holland O.W., Appleton B.R., Narayan J. // J. Appl. Phys. 1983. V. 54. P. 2295.
  25. 25. Appleton B.R., Holland O.W., Poker D.B. et al. // Nucl. Instr. Meeth. Phys. Res. B. 1985. V. 7-8. P. 639.
  26. 26. Gavrilin I.M., Kudryashova Yu.O., Kuz’mina A.A. et al. // J. Electroanalytic. Chem. 2021. V. 888. P. 115209. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115209
  27. 27. Feng R., Kremer F., Sprouster D.J. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015. V. 107. P. 212101.
  28. 28. Feng R., Kremer F., Sprouster D.J. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2015. V. 118. P. 165701.
  29. 29. Donovan T.M., Ashley E.J. // J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1964. V. 54. № 9. P. 1141.
  30. 30. Тауц Я. // УФН. 1968. Т. 94. № 3. С. 501. http://doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.0094.196803e.0501
  31. 31. Liu H., Li S., Sun P. et al. // Mater. Sci. Semicond. Processing. 2018. V. 83. P. 58. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2018.04.019
  32. 32. Donovan T.M., Spicer W.E., Bennett J.M., Ashley E.J. // Phys. Rev. B. 1970. V. 2. № 2. P. 397.
  33. 33. Koffel S., Scheiblin P., Claverie A., Benassayag G. // J. Appl. Phys. 2009. V. 105. P. 13528. http://doi.org/10.1063/1.3041653
  34. 34. Stepanov A.L., Rogov A.M. // Opt. Commun. 2020. V. 474. P. 126052.
  35. 35. Stepanov A.L., Hole D.E., Townsend P.D. // J. Non- Cryst. Solids. 1999. V. 244. P. 275.
  36. 36. Stepanov A.L., Hole D.E., Townsend P.D. // Nucl. Instr. Meeth. Phys. Res. B. 2000. V. 166–167. P. 882.
  37. 37. Ho W.-J., Yang H.-Y., Liu J.-J. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020. V. 508. P. 145275. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145275
  38. 38. Dimoulas A. Tsipas P., Sotirpoulos A. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006. V. 89. P. 252110.
  39. 39. Akkari E., Touayar. O. // Int. J. Nanotehcnology. 2013. V. 10. P. 553.
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library